Data is questionable
Mar 2 2007, 4:10 PM EST
| Post edited: Mar 2 2007, 4:10 PM EST
I'm an MS manager (have been for 7 years, and was a dev 5 years before that). I totally agree with Kevin on this. As compelling and enlightening as some of Mini's blogposts are, this article seemed really sloppy to me. You can't just cull comments from a blog (particularly one in which the comments are likely leaning toward coming from folks who've had the bad experiences or bad teams) and call that "research" -- it's not representative data. Reading this, I found myself wondering what teams these poor souls are (or were) on -- I have a very different experience with stank rankings both as a manager and as a recipient IC, and have never encountered any such blundering or cattiness. I'd add more, but Kevin already covered it well.
0
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Share this